4.7 Article

Comparison of multispectral airborne laser scanning and stereo matching of aerial images as a single sensor solution to forest inventories by tree species

Journal

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
Volume 231, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.05.027

Keywords

Aerial image; Multispectral airborne laser scanning; Semi-global matching; Stereo matching; Tree species

Funding

  1. Finnish Forest Centre
  2. Academy of Finland
  3. FORBIO (The Strategic Research Council) [314224]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) information alone is insufficient for species-specific prediction of forest stand attributes, and therefore auxiliary optical image features (OIF) are commonly used to decrease the prediction errors associated with species-specific tree attributes. However, this requires collection and merging of two data sources, LiDAR and OIF, which increases the costs of the inventory. The recently introduced multispectral LiDAR (M-ALS) provides a potential single-sensor solution for obtaining species-specific information, as its multispectral intensity values resemble optical image data. Image point clouds (IPC) derived from aerial stereo images are another single-sensor option that provides both geometric and optical information. We compared two single-sensor options, M-ALS and IPC, with two LiDAR data sets (leaf-on and leaf-off) with auxiliary OIF, for the prediction of boreal tree species' volumes. In terms of root-mean-square error (RMSE) in the validation data, the LiDAR + OIF combination performed best (leaf-on RMSE: 33.3%; leaf-off RMSE 34.3%), followed by M-ALS + OIF (RMSE = 35.2%) and IPC + OIF (RMSE = 42.4%). The mean RMSE value associated with M-ALS increased to the same level (44.7%) as the IPC + OIF combination when optical image features were not included. Both IPC and M-ALS are potential single sensor solutions for forest inventories, but the use of both LiDAR and OIF provides the most accurate results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available