4.7 Article

Fmask 4.0: Improved cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsats 4-8 and Sentinel-2 imagery

Journal

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
Volume 231, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.05.024

Keywords

Cloud; Cloud shadow; Landsat; Sentinel-2; Auxiliary data; Spectral-contextual; New cloud probability

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development (R&D) Program of China [2018YFD0200301]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41671361]
  3. Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities [ZYGX2012Z005]
  4. USGS-NASA Landsat Science Team (LST) Program for Toward Near Real-time Monitoring and Characterization of Land Surface Change for the Conterminous US [G17PS00256]
  5. China Scholarship Council [201706070113]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We developed the Function of mask (Fmask) 4.0 algorithm for automated cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsats 4-8 and Sentinel-2 images. Three major innovative improvements were made as follows: (1) integration of auxiliary data, where Global Surface Water Occurrence (GSWO) data was used to improve the separation of land and water, and a global Digital Elevation Model (DEM) was used to normalize thermal and cirrus bands; (2) development of new cloud probabilities, in which a Haze Optimized Transformation (HOT)-based cloud probability was designed to replace temperature probability for Sentinel-2 images, and cloud probabilities were combined and re-calibrated for different sensors against a global reference dataset; and (3) utilization of spectral contextual features, where a Spectral-Contextual Snow Index (SCSI) was created for better distinguishing snow/ice from clouds in polar regions, and a morphology -based approach was applied to reduce the commission error in bright land surfaces (e.g., urban/built-up and mountain snow/ice). The Fmask 4.0 algorithm showed higher overall accuracies for Landsats 4-8 imagery than the 3.3 version (Zhu et al., 2015) (92.40% versus 90.73% for Landsats 4-7 and 94.59% versus 93.30% for Landsat 8), and much higher overall accuracies for Sentinel-2 imagery than the 2.5.5 version of the Sen2Cor algorithm (Mtiller-Wilm et al., 2018) (94.30% versus 87.10%).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available