4.7 Article

Reliability assessment of a continuous-state fuel cell stack system with multiple degrading components

Journal

RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
Volume 189, Issue -, Pages 157-164

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.04.021

Keywords

Continuous-state systems; Degradation analysis; Failure-time distribution; Gibbs sampling; Hierarchical Bayesian modeling; k-out-of-m:Fsystem

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant NSFC [71571178]
  2. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2018R1D1A1A09083149]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1D1A1A09083149] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) stack is a multi-component system composed of continuously degrading fuel cells. The voltage degradation of the fuel cells causes the degradation of the stack system, which has two system-level degradation measures; the overall stack output voltage and the minimum voltage of individual cells. This paper develops a hierarchical Bayesian modeling and data analysis method to predict the reliability of a PEMFC stack system using the voltage degradation data collected from its fuel cell components. We introduce a two-term exponential model to describe the nonlinear voltage degradation paths of the fuel cell components, then builds a hierarchical Bayesian degradation model to predict the stack system reliability by taking a k-out-of-m:F system into account. Possible alternative modeling approaches are discussed with an in-depth comparison. This paper will contribute to the modeling and data analysis methods for continuous-state systems composed of continuous-state components.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available