4.7 Article

Safety analysis of plugging and abandonment of oil and gas wells in uncertain conditions with limited data

Journal

RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
Volume 188, Issue -, Pages 133-141

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.03.027

Keywords

Bayesian network; Decommissioning; Plugging and abandonment; Well barrier failure

Funding

  1. John Blackburn Main fellowship through IMarEST, United Kingdom
  2. Engineering the Future fellowship
  3. Department of Naval, Ocean and Marine Engineering at the University of Strathclyde
  4. Natural Science and Engineering Council of Canada
  5. Canada Research Chair (CRC) Tier I Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Well plugging and abandonment are necessitated to ensure safe closure of a non-producing offshore asset. Little or no condition monitoring is done after the abandonment operation, and data are often unavailable to analyze the risks of potential leakage. It is therefore essential to capture all inherent and evolving hazards associated with this activity before its implementation. The current probabilistic risk analysis approaches such as fault tree, event tree and bowtie though able to model potential leak scenarios; these approaches have limited capabilities to handle evolving well conditions and data unavailability. Many of the barriers of an abandoned well deteriorates over time and are dependent on external conditions, making it necessary to consider advanced approaches to model potential leakage risk. This paper presents a Bayesian network-based model for well plugging and abandonment. The proposed model able to handle evolving conditions of the barriers, their failure dependence and, also uncertainty in the data. The model uses advanced logic conditions such as Noisy-OR and leaky Noisy-OR to define the condition and data dependency. The proposed model is explained and tested on a case study from the Elgin platform's well plugging and abandonment failure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available