4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

NORTHEAST PACIFIC SEAWATER RADIOCARBON RECORDED IN ABALONE SHELLS OBTAINED FROM OTSUCHI BAY, JAPAN

Journal

RADIOCARBON
Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages 1249-1258

Publisher

UNIV ARIZONA DEPT GEOSCIENCES
DOI: 10.1017/RDC.2019.95

Keywords

abalone shell; AMS; Otsuchi Bay; Oyashio Current

Funding

  1. MEXT [KAKENHI JP15KK0151, JP17H01168]
  2. JST CREST, Japan [JPMJCR13A4]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study suggests that analyzing radiocarbon in abalone shells can help reconstruct past seawater conditions in northern Japan, particularly in cases where coral skeletons are not available for ocean mixing studies.
Reconstructing past ocean currents in the coastal regions is necessary to better understand the relationship between oceanographic changes and coastal ecosystems. It is known that variations have occurred with large-scale climate changes such as ENSO (El Nino Southern Oscillations) and PDO (Pacific Decadal Oscillations). Thus, reconstruction of past seawater conditions in coastal regions is needed to better understand the relationship between oceanographic changes and coastal ecosystems. Seawater radiocarbon is a unique proxy to understand the properties of water masses. Reef-building corals have been employed extensively and successfully in conducting this type of research into past ocean circulation histories. However, their distribution is limited to the low latitudes and hence alternative archives are required for studies in mid to high-latitude locations. Here, we use abalone shell samples obtained from Otsuchi Bay located in the Tohoku region on the Pacific coast of Northern Japan. Radiocarbon in abalone shells was compared with dissolved inorganic carbon in two-year-long records of river water as well as seawater. The data indicate that abalone shells can be used to reconstruct past seawater radiocarbon variations in northern Japan where coral skeletons are not available for ocean mixing studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available