4.6 Review

The sustainable development goals provide an important framework for addressing dangerous climate change and achieving wider public health benefits

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 174, Issue -, Pages 65-68

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.05.018

Keywords

Sustainable development goals; Climate change; Health policy; Global health; International health policy; Health co-benefits

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To suggest how public health systems and the health sector can utilise the United Nation (UN) sustainable development goals (SDGs) to address climate change and other threats to future health and deliver immediate public health benefits. Study design and methods: We examined UN and World Health Organisation guidance on A SDGs and other published texts on systems thinking, integration, universality and co-benefits. Results and conclusions: The UN SDGs are a set of globally agreed objectives to end poverty, protect all that makes the planet habitable and ensure that all people enjoy peace and prosperity. The SDGs integrate the three dimensions of sustainable development (economic, environmental and social), they apply to high-income countries as well as developing countries and there are mechanisms to hold countries to account. There are three crucial issues for public health. First, a systems approach to future proof health and social justice. Second, an evidence-based approach to aid communication, framing and engagement. And, third, the importance of interventions that deliver health co-benefits (i.e. both immediate and long-term benefits to health, equity and prosperity). The SDGs present public health professionals with an important opportunity to create the right conditions for a better future through the organised efforts of society. (C) 2019 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available