4.5 Article

Charismatic leadership and tacit knowledge sharing in the context of enterprise systems learning: the mediating effect of psychological safety climate and intrinsic motivation

Journal

BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 194-208

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2016.1221461

Keywords

Charismatic leadership; psychological safety climate; intrinsic motivation; enterprise systems; tacit knowledge sharing

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71301035, 71371059, 71472053, 71429001]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015T80362, 2013M541399]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20132302110017, 20132302120017]
  4. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [LBH-Z13109]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Drawing upon charismatic leadership and intrinsic motivation theory, we developed a theoretical model to examine the impact mechanism of leader charisma on individuals' tacit knowledge-sharing behaviour in the context of an Enterprise Systems learning team. We conducted a survey-based field study to examine the theoretical model and hypotheses. A total of 153 questionnaires were distributed to employees from more than 20 branches of the Beidahuang Group in China and 117 valid questionnaires were returned. Results from partial least squares analysis suggest that leader charisma has a strong influence on psychological safety climate, which in turn has a positive impact on individuals' intrinsic motivation and their tacit knowledge-sharing behaviour. Our research findings unpack the impact mechanism of charismatic leadership on tacit knowledge sharing, and provide guidelines for the team leader to exhibit charismatic leadership traits in order to promote a psychological safety climate and facilitate an effective knowledge sharing of enterprise systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available