4.8 Article

Idiosyncratic neural coding and neuromodulation of olfactory individuality in Drosophila

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1901623116

Keywords

odor preference; individuality; sensory stimuli; neural encoding; neuromodulation

Funding

  1. Sloan Research Fellowship
  2. Klingenstein-Simons Fellowship Award
  3. Smith Family Odyssey Award
  4. Harvard/MIT Basic Neuroscience Grant
  5. National Science Foundation [IOS-1557913]
  6. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  7. Harvard's Quantitative Biology Initiative

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Innate behavioral biases and preferences can vary significantly among individuals of the same genotype. Though individuality is a fundamental property of behavior, it is not currently understood how individual differences in brain structure and physiology produce idiosyncratic behaviors. Here we present evidence for idiosyncrasy in olfactory behavior and neural responses in Drosophila. We show that individual female Drosophila from a highly inbred laboratory strain exhibit idiosyncratic odor preferences that persist for days. We used in vivo calcium imaging of neural responses to compare projection neuron (second-order neurons that convey odor information from the sensory periphery to the central brain) responses to the same odors across animals. We found that, while odor responses appear grossly stereotyped, upon closer inspection, many individual differences are apparent across antenna! lobe (AL) glomeruli (compact microcircuits corresponding to different odor channels). Moreover, we show that neuromodulation, environmental stress in the form of altered nutrition, and activity of certain AL local interneurons affect the magnitude of interfly behavioral variability. Taken together, this work demonstrates that individual Drosophila exhibit idiosyncratic olfactory preferences and idiosyncratic neural responses to odors, and that behavioral idiosyncrasies are subject to neuromodulation and regulation by neurons in the AL.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available