4.7 Article

Lamellar structures in blends of amorphous-block-main-chain liquid crystal-block-amorphous copolymers and amorphous homopolymers: Effects of the amorphous homopolymer molecular weight

Journal

POLYMER
Volume 178, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.121555

Keywords

Block copolymer blends; Lamellar structure; Liquid crystal

Funding

  1. JST Strategic Promotion of Innovative Research and Development, Japan [JPMJSV0915]
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [JP19H02770, JP19H05120]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

T(x-y-x) block copolymers comprising of a main-chain liquid crystal (LC) BB-5(3-Me) polyester with a number-average molecular weight (M-n) of y kDa connected to poly(ethyl methacrylate) (PEMA) with a M-n of x kDa at both ends form long-range lamellar microdomains with the blocks segregated from one another over a wide-range of compositions. In this study, the lamellar forming T(5.5-39-5.5) and T(11-39-11) copolymers were blended with homoPEMA (Hz) with M-n of z kDa at a concentration of 20 wt% to give the two series of blends T(5.5-39-5.5)/Hz and T(11-39-11)/Hz. These blends were examined for microdomain morphology as a function of the molecular weight ratio of z/x. T(5.5-39-5.5)/Hz formed lamellar microdomains over the investigated z/x range of 0.8-4.1, whereas T(11-39-11)/Hz formed lamellae over a narrower range of 0.9-2.3. The lamellar spacing and the PEMA and LC lamellar thicknesses (d(am) and d(LC)) were constant over z/x and d am was greater than d am of the neat copolymer. However, the values of d(LC) for these two blends were different; T(5.5-39-5.5)/Hz had the same d(LC) as T(5.5-39-5.5), whereas T(11-39-11)/Hz had a smaller d(LC) than T(11-39-11). These lamellar thicknesses variations in the blends are discussed in view of the conformations of the copolymer blocks and the accommodation fashion of the Hz additives.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available