4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Polar cod egg and larval drift patterns in the Svalbard archipelago

Journal

POLAR BIOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 8, Pages 1029-1042

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00300-019-02549-6

Keywords

Boreogadus saida; Particle tracking model; Spawning sites; Distribution; Habitat associations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spawning of polar cod (Boreogadus saida) in the vicinity of the Svalbard archipelago has not been directly observed. From the distribution pattern of polar cod 0-group observed during annual monitoring of the Barents Sea, it has, however, been inferred that spawning occurs in Svalbard waters most years. We wanted to investigate the possibility of back-tracking the larvae from these observed distribution areas to the spawning areas from which they originated and applied a coupled ocean-sea ice and particle tracking model to simulate the drift of particles released at suggested spawning sites. The model was run for 1 year (December 2006-September 2007), and the results were compared to observations of polar cod larvae in the autumns of 2007 and 2004-2010. The particles released in the western fjords were mostly retained in the fjords. For the rest of the suggested spawning grounds, the released particles drifted mostly clockwise around the archipelago. Model runs mainly indicated a drift pattern with end points that qualitatively match the main features of the August-September distribution of the polar cod 0-group observed. We conclude that the suggested spawning sites on the southern, northern and eastern sides of Svalbard could have caused a distribution of 0-group polar cod similar to that observed during August-September 2007. From the environmental factors experienced during drift of eggs and larvae and assumptions about habitat suitability for survival and growth, we conclude that spawning in the Svalbard area probably occurs on the southern and eastern sides and later than the area in the southeastern Barents Sea.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available