4.6 Article

Whole blood microRNA expression associated with stroke: Results from the Framingham Heart Study

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219261

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Robert Katzman Research Training Fellowship in Alzheimer's and Dementia Research - American Academy of Neurology
  2. American Brain Foundation
  3. Alzheimer's Association
  4. [P30AG10161]
  5. [R01AG15819]
  6. [R01AG17917]
  7. [R01AG30146]
  8. [R01AG36836]
  9. [U01AG32984]
  10. [U01AG46152]
  11. [N01-HC 25195]
  12. [HHSN268201500001I]
  13. [75N92019D00031]
  14. [NS017950]
  15. [UH2NS100605]
  16. [AG049505]
  17. [AG052409]
  18. [AG054076]
  19. [AG049607]
  20. [AG059421]
  21. [T32NS048005]
  22. [AG057760]
  23. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [ZIAHL006001] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Emerging evidence suggests microRNAs (miRNAs) may play an important role in explaining variation in stroke risk and recovery in humans, yet there are still few longitudinal studies examining the association between whole blood miRNAs and stroke. Accounting for multiple testing and adjusting for potentially confounding technical and clinical variables, here we show that whole blood miR-574-3p expression was significantly lower in participants with chronic stroke compared to non-cases. To explore the functional relevance of our findings, we analyzed miRNA-mRNA whole blood co-expression, pathway enrichment, and brain tissue gene expression. Results suggest miR-574-3p is involved in neurometabolic and chronic neuronal injury response pathways, including brain gene expression of DBNDD2 and ELOVL1. These results suggest miR-574-3p plays a role in regulating chronic brain and systemic cellular response to stroke and thus may implicate miR-574-3p as a partial mediator of long-term stroke outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available