Journal
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages 1269-1274Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arw060
Keywords
acoustic adaptation hypothesis; acoustic masking; anthropogenic noise; bioacoustics; frequency shift; soundscape
Categories
Funding
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
- Groupe de recherche interuniversitaire en limnologie et en environnement aquatique (GRIL)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Anthropogenic noise has been shown to alter the transmission environment and distort acoustic signals, prompting vocalizing species to use compensatory mechanisms. Through a meta-analysis we investigated the relative importance of biological and contextual factors predisposing species to shift their singing/calling frequencies in response to anthropogenic noise. We gathered data from 36 studies, synthesizing information on more than 160 experiments and 60 bird and anuran species. To estimate the breadth of frequency shift, we calculated a standardized effect size using Hedges' g. We fitted a multilevel linear mixed-effect model on g as the dependent variable weighted by its inverse variance, with typical frequency, body mass, experimental condition, and noise source type as independent terms. Our results reveal broader shifts in smaller bird species when compared with bigger species, an effect that was emphasized in the low-frequency component of the song spectrum. Birds increased their dominant frequencies when confronted to anthropogenic noise, whereas anurans were less prone to such shifts. Human-altered acoustic environments can be considered a novel selective force impelling change to the communication patterns of many vocalizing species.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available