4.7 Article

Beyond rest and quiescence (endodormancy and ecodormancy): A novel model for quantifying plant-environment interaction in bud dormancy release

Journal

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 40-54

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pce.13650

Keywords

chilling; dormancy; ecodormancy; endodormancy; forcing; growth onset; phenology models; post-rest; quiescence; rest

Categories

Funding

  1. Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation
  2. Nessling Foundation [2006253]
  3. Swedish Cultural Foundation in Finland
  4. Societas pro Fauna et Flora Fennica
  5. Academy of Finland [122194]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bud dormancy of plants has traditionally been explained either by physiological growth arresting conditions in the bud or by unfavourable environmental conditions, such as non-growth-promoting low air temperatures. This conceptual dichotomy has provided the framework also for developing process-based plant phenology models. Here, we propose a novel model that in addition to covering the classical dichotomy as a special case also allows the quantification of an interaction of physiological and environmental factors. According to this plant-environment interaction suggested conceptually decades ago, rather than being unambiguous, the concept of non-growth-promoting low air temperature depends on the dormancy status of the plant. We parameterized the model with experimental results of growth onset for seven boreal plant species and found that based on the strength of the interaction, the species can be classified into three dormancy types, only one of which represents the traditional dichotomy. We also tested the model with four species in an independent experiment. Our study suggests that interaction of environmental and physiological factors may be involved in many such phenomena that have until now been considered simply as plant traits without any considerations of effects of the environmental factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available