4.7 Review

Beneficial microbes going underground of root immunity

Journal

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 42, Issue 10, Pages 2860-2870

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pce.13632

Keywords

host immune evasion; plant immunity; plant microbiome; rhizosphere; soil microbiology

Categories

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council
  2. H2020 European Research Council
  3. China Scholarship Council fellowship
  4. European Research Council Advanced [269072]
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [269072] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plant roots interact with an enormous diversity of commensal, mutualistic, and pathogenic microbes, which poses a big challenge to roots to distinguish beneficial microbes from harmful ones. Plants can effectively ward off pathogens following immune recognition of conserved microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs). However, such immune elicitors are essentially not different from those of neutral and beneficial microbes that are abundantly present in the root microbiome. Recent studies indicate that the plant immune system plays an active role in influencing rhizosphere microbiome composition. Moreover, it has become increasingly clear that root-invading beneficial microbes, including rhizobia and arbuscular mycorrhiza, evade or suppress host immunity to establish a mutualistic relationship with their host. Evidence is accumulating that many free-living rhizosphere microbiota members can suppress root immune responses, highlighting root immune suppression as an important function of the root microbiome. Thus, the gate keeping functions of the plant immune system are not restricted to warding off root-invading pathogens but also extend to rhizosphere microbiota, likely to promote colonization by beneficial microbes and prevent growth-defense tradeoffs triggered by the MAMP-rich rhizosphere environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available