4.7 Article

The retromer protein ZmVPS29 regulates maize kernel morphology likely through an auxin-dependent process(es)

Journal

PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 1004-1014

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pbi.13267

Keywords

auxin; kernel morphology; maize; retromer; ZmVPS29

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [91735306, 91335206]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFD0100303, 2016YFD0100103]
  3. CAAS Innovation Program
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M620969]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Kernel size and morphology are two important yield-determining traits in maize, but their molecular and genetic mechanisms are poorly characterized. Here, we identified a major QTL, qKM4.08, which explains approximately 24.20% of the kernel morphology variance in a recombinant population derived from two elite maize inbred lines, Huangzaosi (HZS, round kernel) and LV28 (slender kernel). Positional cloning and transgenic analysis revealed that qKM4.08 encodes ZmVPS29, a retromer complex component. Compared with the ZmVPS29 HZS allele, the ZmVPS29 LV28 allele showed higher expression in developing kernels. Overexpression of ZmVPS29 conferred a slender kernel morphology and increased the yield per plant in different maize genetic backgrounds. Sequence analysis revealed that ZmVPS29 has been under purifying selection during maize domestication. Association analyses identified two significant kernel morphology-associated polymorphic sites in the ZmVPS29 promoter region that were significantly enriched in modern maize breeding lines. Further study showed that ZmVPS29 increased auxin accumulation during early kernel development by enhancing auxin biosynthesis and transport and reducing auxin degradation and thereby improved kernel development. Our results suggest that ZmVPS29 regulates kernel morphology, most likely through an auxin-dependent process(es).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available