4.7 Article

Frequent fires alter tree architecture and impair reproduction of a common fire-tolerant savanna tree

Journal

PLANT BIOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 106-112

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/plb.13038

Keywords

Crown architecture; fire; flower production; fruit production; germination; savanna

Categories

Funding

  1. CNPq Funding Source: Medline
  2. Universidade de Brasília Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several Cerrado tree species have traits and structures that protect from fires. The effectiveness of a trait depends on the fire regime, especially the frequency. We usedVochysia elliptica, a common Cerrado tree, as a model to test whether different fire frequencies alter crown architecture and flower, fruit and seed production. We analysed the effect of fire on the production of inflorescences, fruits and seeds, as well as seed germination and tree architecture of 20 trees in each of three plots of a long-term ecological experiment managed with different fire regimes: burned every 2 years (B), burned every 4 years (Q) in mid-dry season and an area protected from fire (C). We found a large negative effect of fire frequency on crown architecture and on flower and fruit production. Trees in C and Q had significantly more main branches and a larger crown area than trees in B. At its peak, a tree in C was expected to produce 2.4 times more inflorescences than Q, and 15.5 times more than B, with similar magnitudes for fruits. Sixty per cent of trees in B and 10% in Q produced no fruits. The differences in architecture might explain the reduction in sexual reproduction due to a smaller physical space to produce flowers at the branch apices. Resource limitation due to plant investment to replace burned vegetative parts may also decrease sexual reproduction. Our results indicate potentially severe consequences of high fire frequencies for population dynamics and species persistence in Cerrado communities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available