4.4 Article

Minimal important difference for London Chest Activity of Daily Living scale in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Journal

PHYSIOTHERAPY
Volume 107, Issue -, Pages 28-35

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2019.08.007

Keywords

Minimal clinically important difference; Pulmonary disease; Chronic obstructive; Rehabilitation; Activities of daily living; Outcome assessment

Categories

Funding

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Ensino Superior, Brazil
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico, Brazil [14/2014]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa e Inovacao do Estado de Santa Catarina, Brazil (PAP UDESC) [2017TR645, 01/2016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives To determine the minimal important difference (MID) for the London Chest Activity of Daily Living scale (LCADL) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), focusing on the percentage of the total score (LCADL(%total)), using an anchor-based method in addition to distribution-based methods. Design Non-controlled before-and-after study. Setting Two outpatient centres. Participants Seventy-seven patients with COPD (GOLD II-IV 47 males, forced expiratory volume in 1 second mean 37 (SD 14) % predicted). Interventions Aerobic training and localised training for upper and lower limbs was conducted for 24 sessions, three times per week. Main outcome measures The main outcome was LCADL score pre- and post-exercise training. The MID was established using distribution and anchor-based methods. The modified Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire was the anchor for the analysis of sensitivity and specificity of the MID. Results The established MIDs ranged from -2.1 to -5.9 points for LCADL(total) and from -2 to -6 points for LCADL(%total). The receiver operating characteristic curve indicated a cut-off point of -3 points for LCADL(total) (sensitivity 51%, specificity 82%; P = 0.01) and -4 points for LCADL(%total) (sensitivity 56%, specificity 82%; P= 0.04). Conclusions The present findings suggest -3 points and -4 points as the MIDs for LCADL(total) and LCADL(%total), respectively. (C) 2019 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available