4.6 Review

STEM CELLS AND THE DIFFERENTIATION HIERARCHY IN MAMMARY GLAND DEVELOPMENT

Journal

PHYSIOLOGICAL REVIEWS
Volume 100, Issue 2, Pages 489-523

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00040.2018

Keywords

breast cancer; mammary gland development; progenitors; stem cells; transcriptional regulators

Categories

Funding

  1. Cancer Council Victoria Scholarship
  2. Cancer Therapeutics CRC Top-Up Scholarship
  3. National Breast Cancer Foundation/Cure Cancer Australia Fellowship
  4. Duke-NUS Faculty Start-up Fund
  5. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [1078730]
  6. NHMRC Elizabeth Blackburn Research Fellowship [1102742]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mammary gland is a highly dynamic organ that undergoes profound changes within its epithelium during puberty and the reproductive cycle. These changes are fueled by dedicated stem and progenitor cells. Both short- and long-lived lineage-restricted progenitors have been identified in adult tissue as well as a small pool of multipotent mammary stem cells (MaSCs), reflecting intrinsic complexity within the epithelial hierarchy. While unipotent progenitor cells predominantly execute day-to-day homeostasis and postnatal morphogenesis during puberty and pregnancy, multipotent MaSCs have been implicated in coordinating alveologenesis and long-term ductal maintenance. Nonetheless, the multipotency of stem cells in the adult remains controversial. The advent of large-scale single-cell molecular profiling has revealed striking changes in the gene expression landscape through ontogeny and the presence of transient intermediate populations. An increasing number of lineage cell-fate determination factors and potential niche regulators have now been mapped along the hierarchy, with many implicated in breast carcinogenesis. The emerging diversity among stem and progenitor populations of the mammary epithelium is likely to underpin the heterogeneity that characterizes breast cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available