4.6 Article

Predicting Improved Daily Use of the More Affected Arm Poststroke Following Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy

Journal

PHYSICAL THERAPY
Volume 99, Issue 12, Pages 1667-1678

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzz121

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ohio State University Office of the Provost Chronic Brain Injury Discovery Theme initiative
  2. American Heart Association
  3. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)
  4. Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences) [8UL1TR000090-05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Constraint-induced movement therapy (CI therapy) produces, on average, large and clinically meaningful improvements in the daily use of a more affected upper extremity in individuals with hemiparesis. However, individual responses vary widely. Objective. The study objective was to investigate the extent to which individual characteristics before treatment predict improved use of the more affected arm following CI therapy. Design. This study was a retrospective analysis of 47 people who had chronic (> 6 months) mild to moderate upper extremity hemiparesis and were consecutively enrolled in 2 CI therapy randomized controlled trials. Methods. An enhanced probabilistic neural network model predicted whether individuals showed a low, medium, or high response to CI therapy, as measured with the Motor Activity Log, on the basis of the following baseline assessments: Wolf Motor Function Test, Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Test of touch threshold, Motor Activity Log, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Then, a neural dynamic classification algorithm was applied to improve prognostic accuracy using the most accurate combination obtained in the previous step. Results. Motor ability and tactile sense predicted improvement in arm use for daily activities following intensive upper extremity rehabilitation with an accuracy of nearly 100%. Complex patterns of interaction among these predictors were observed. Limitations. The fact that this study was a retrospective analysis with a moderate sample size was a limitation. Conclusions. Advanced machine learning/classification algorithms produce more accurate personalized predictions of rehabilitation outcomes than commonly used general linear models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available