4.4 Article

Airway disease on chest computed tomography of preschool children with cystic fibrosis is associated with school-age bronchiectasis

Journal

PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages 141-148

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.24498

Keywords

bronchiectasis; computed tomography; cystic fibrosis; imaging; preschool children

Funding

  1. Netherlands CF Society (NCFS) as part of the HIT-CF program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Airway wall thickening and mucus plugging are important characteristics of cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease in the first 5 years of life.The aim of this study is to investigate the association of lung disease in preschool children (age, 2-6) with bronchiectasis and other clinical outcome measures in the school age (age >7). Deidentified computed tomography-scans were annotated using Perth-Rotterdam annotated grid morphometric analysis for CF. Preschool %disease (a composite score of %airway wall thickening, %mucus plugging, and %bronchiectasis) and %MUPAT (a composite score of %airway wall thickening and %mucus plugging) were used as predictors for %bronchiectasis and several other school-age clinical outcomes. For statistical analysis, we used regression analysis, linear mixed-effects models and two-way mixed models. Sixty-one patients were included. %Disease increased significantly with age (P < .01). Preschool %disease and %MUPAT were significantly associated with school-age %bronchiectasis (P < .01 and P < .01, respectively). No significant association was found between preschool %disease and %MUPAT and school-age forced expiratory volume 1 (FEV1%) predicted and quality of life (P > .05). Cross-sectional, %disease in school-age was associated with a low FEV1% predicted and low quality of life (P = .01 and P = .007, respectively). %Disease can be considered an early marker of diffuse airways disease and is a risk factor for school-age bronchiectasis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available