4.2 Article

Genetic diversity of groEL and msp4 sequences of Anaplasma ovis infecting camels from Tunisia

Journal

PARASITOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 74, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.parint.2019.101980

Keywords

Anaplasma ovis; Camels (Camelus dromedarius); Molecular detection; msp4 and groEL typing; Phylogenetic analysis; Tunisia

Categories

Funding

  1. Tunisian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research [LR16AGR01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To date, no information is available regarding the infection of camels (Camelus dromedarius) by Anaplasma ovis in North African region. Several animal species can be infected by A. ovis which further complicates its natural infection cycle. In this paper, we investigated the occurrence and the genetic diversity of A. ovis in camels and ticks collected from them in Tunisia and the risk factor analysis. Camel blood samples (n = 412) and tick (n = 300) samples, identified as Hyalomma dromedarii (n = 149, 49.6%), H. impeltatum (n = 142, 47.3%) and H. excavatum (n = 9, 3%), were analyzed by conventional PCR followed by the sequencing of msp4 and groEL genes. A. ovis DNA was identified in five camels (1.2%), but not in infesting ticks (0%). The microscopic examination revealed the specific infection of camel erythrocytes by Anaplasma inclusions. The msp4 and groEL typing confirmed the natural infection of camels by A. ovis and revealed two different msp4 genotypes earlier detected in Tunisian small ruminants and their infested ticks, and five different and novel groEL genetic variants forming a separately sub-cluster within A. ovis cluster. The occurrence of different A. ovis strains specific to camels associated with a low prevalence of this Anaplasma species in camels may enrich knowledge regarding the distribution and the transmission cycle of this bacterium in arid and Saharan areas of Tunisia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available