4.6 Article

A reproducible protocol for neonatal ischemic injury and cardiac regeneration in neonatal mice

Journal

BASIC RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY
Volume 111, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00395-016-0580-3

Keywords

Cardiac regeneration; Myocardial infarction; Neonatal LAD ligation; Mouse model

Funding

  1. Fondation Leducq grant
  2. Austrian Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cardiac regeneration is one of the prime visions in cardiovascular research. The mouse neonatal apical resection and left anterior descending artery (LAD) ligation model introduced novel in vivo mammalian assays to study cardiac regeneration. However, recent reports and editorials discussed and critically questioned the value and technical reproducibility of the mouse neonatal myocardial infarction approach, making it paramount to develop and use a reproducible model system. We established a mouse neonatal myocardial infarction model by visually confirmed ligation of the LAD using microsurgery. TdT-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) proved reproducible massive myocardial infarctions in a defined region of the apex and anterior wall of neonatal and 7-dayold mice. Whereas hearts ligated on postnatal day 7 displayed chronic injury, cardiac samples ligated immediately after birth always showed complete structural regeneration after long-term follow-up. Cardiac regeneration was observed in all mouse stains (C57BL/6J, ICR, and mixed background C57BL/6JxSv129) tested so far. We present a detailed in vivo protocol to study complex mechanisms of complete cardiac repair following ischemic cardiac damage. Neonatal LAD ligation surgery is feasible, and results in reproducible myocardial infarctions 24 h after ligation, and no structural myocardial defects are detectable following long-term follow-up. We encourage the cardiovascular community to use our protocol and teaching video to answer key scientific questions in the field of cardiac regeneration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available