4.6 Article

Saliva microbiome in primary Sjogren's syndrome reveals distinct set of disease-associated microbes

Journal

ORAL DISEASES
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 295-301

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/odi.13191

Keywords

microbiome; renal tubular acidosis; saliva; Sjogren's syndrome

Funding

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India [OLP1105]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective This study systematically aims to evaluate the salivary microbiome in patients with primary Sjogren's syndrome (pSS) using 16S rRNA sequencing approach. Methods DNA isolation and 16S rRNA sequencing was performed on saliva of 37 pSS and 35 control (CC) samples on HiSeq 2500 platform. 16S rRNA sequence analysis was performed independently using two popular computational pipelines, QIIME and less operational taxonomic units scripts (LoTuS). Results There were no significant changes in the alpha diversity between saliva of patients and controls. However, four genera including Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Dialister and Leptotrichia were found to be differential between the two sets, and common between both QIIME and LoTuS analysis pipelines (Fold change of 2 and p < .05). Bifidobacterium, Dialister and Lactobacillus were found to be enriched, while Leptotrichia was significantly depleted in pSS compared to the controls. Exploration of microbial diversity measures (Chao1, observed species and Shannon index) revealed a significant increase in the diversity in patients with renal tubular acidosis. An opposite trend was noted, with depletion of diversity in patients with steroids. Conclusion Our analysis suggests that while no significant changes in the diversity of the salivary microbiome could be observed in Sjogren's syndrome compared to the controls, a set of four genera were significantly and consistently differential in the saliva of patients with pSS. Additionally, a difference in alpha diversity in patients with renal tubular acidosis and those on steroids was observed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available