4.6 Article

Object-independent image-based wavefront sensing approach using phase diversity images and deep learning

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 27, Issue 18, Pages 26102-26119

Publisher

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.27.026102

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFE0205000, 2016YFF0103603]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61705223, 61805235]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes an image-based wavefront sensing approach using deep learning, which is applicable to both point source and any extended scenes at the same time, while the training process is performed without any simulated or real ex tended scenes. Rather than directly recovering phase information from image plane intensities, we first extract a special feature in the frequency domain that is independent of the original objects but only determined by phase aberrations (a pair of phase diversity images is needed in this process). Then the deep long short-term memory (LSTM) network (a variant of recurrent neural network) is introduced to establish the accurate non-linear mapping between the extracted feature image and phase aberrations. Simulations and an experiment are performed to demonstrate the effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed approach. Some other discussions are further presented for demonstrating the superior non-linear fitting capacity of deep LSTM compared to Resnet 18 (a variant of convolutional neural network) specifically for the problem encountered in this paper. The effect of the incoherency of light on the accuracy of the recovered wavefront phase is also quantitatively discussed. This work will contribute to the application of deep learning to image-based wavefront sensing and high-resolution image reconstruction. (C) 2019 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available