4.5 Article

Does a rise in plasma erythropoietin after high-altitude exposure affect FGF23 in healthy volunteers on a normal or low-phosphorus diet?

Journal

NUTRITION METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
Volume 29, Issue 12, Pages 1361-1367

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2019.09.002

Keywords

Hypoxia; EPO; FGF23; CKD-MBD metabolites

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and aims: Data of experimental rodent models suggest that hypoxia with subsequent increase in erythropoietin stimulates the expression of the phosphaturic hormone fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23). Methods and results: To translate the findings of animal studies into human physiology, herein we exposed eight healthy volunteers to high altitude (2656 m above sea level) for four days. The volunteers were randomized on a low-phosphorous diet (n = 4) or a normal phosphorus diet (n = 4). Although high-altitude exposure caused a significant increase in plasma erythropoietin (EPO) (before high-altitude exposure: low phosphorus: median EPO 6.6 mIU/ml [interquartile range (IQR) 6.0; 8.2], normal phosphorus: median EPO 9.0 mIU/ml [IQR 7.9; 11.5]; at day 2: low phosphorus: median EPO 21.3 mIU/ml [IQR 19.5; 23.8], normal phosphorus: median EPO 19.4 mIU/ml [IQR 18.0; 20.8]), there was no consistent increase in plasma c-terminal FGF23 or plasma intact FGF23. We observed only a single, intermittent peak in c-terminal FGF23 levels after 5 h of maximal aerobic exercise. Conclusion: These data do not support a substantial effect of moderate hypoxia alone on the expression of FGF23, but they suggest that combined exercise and high-altitude exposure may temporarily induce FGF23 expression. (C) 2019 The Italian Society of Diabetology, the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis, the Italian Society of Human Nutrition, and the Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available