4.4 Article

Input and mineralization of carbon and nitrogen in soil from legume-based cover crops

Journal

NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS
Volume 116, Issue 1, Pages 1-18

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10705-019-10026-z

Keywords

Catch crops; Leaf-labeling; C-13; (15) N; N Fertilizer effect; Soil C sequestration

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Legume-based cover crops (CC) provide a wide range of ecosystem services, including nitrate leaching reduction, nitrogen (N) fertilization and soil carbon (C) sequestration. However, the scarcity of information on belowground C and N increases the uncertainty on the magnitude of these effects. We quantified C and N input in soil (hereafter plant-deposition) from red clover and winter vetch CC in pure stands or in mixtures with non-legumes, under field conditions. To do so, we labeled CC plants in situ with C-13 (CO2) and N-15 (leaf-labeling) throughout their growing period, with frequent multiple-pulses. After sampling, we incubated labeled CC roots and soil in the laboratory to investigate C and N mineralization. Cover crops produced 1.7-2.7 Mg ha(-1) aboveground biomass corresponding to 72-86 kg N ha(-1), and deposited to the soil 72-183 kg C ha(-1) and 29-113 kg N ha(-1). Cover crops allocated nearly equal proportions of C and N to above- and belowground fractions. Mineralization of root C was 11-18%, while N mineralization was 39-56% after four months of incubation at 10 degrees C. Mineral N derived from N plant-deposition to soil was on average 7 kg N ha(-1) after incubation, accounting for approximately 10% of mineral N release from red clover shoots and roots. Overall, C and N inputs from legume-based CC are substantially underestimated if plant-deposition is not taken into account. In addition, net mineral N derived from plant-deposition contributes significantly to the N fertilizer effect of legume-based CC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available