4.8 Article

CFEA: a cell-free epigenome atlas in human diseases

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 48, Issue D1, Pages D40-D44

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz715

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61871294, 61873193, 81822030]
  2. Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LR19C060001]
  3. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [7172175]
  4. Special Foundation for Key Basic Research of Wenzhou Institute of Biomaterials and Engineering, CAS, China [WIBEZD-2017-009-05]
  5. CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences [2016-I2M-1-001, 2017I2M-3-004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Epigenetic alterations, including 5-methylcytosine (5mC), 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) and nucleosome positioning (NP), in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) have been widely observed in human diseases, and many available cfDNA-based epigenome-wide profiles exhibit high sensitivity and specificity in disease detection and classification. However, due to the lack of efficient collection, standardized quality control, and analysis procedures, efficiently integrating and reusing these data remain considerable challenges. Here, we introduce CFEA (http://www.bio-data.cn/CFEA), a cell-free epigenome database dedicated to three types of widely adopted epigenetic modifications (5mC, 5hmC and NP) involved in 27 human diseases. We developed bioinformatic pipelines for quality control and standard data processing and an easy-to-use web interface to facilitate the query, visualization and download of these cell-free epigenome data. We alsomanually curated related biological and clinical information for each profile, allowing users to better browse and compare cfDNA epigenomes at a specific stage (such as early- or metastasis-stage) of cancer development. CFEA provides a comprehensive and timely resource to the scientific community and supports the development of liquid biopsy-based biomarkers for various human diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available