4.6 Article

Natural selection acting on integrated phenotypes: covariance among functional leaf traits increases plant fitness

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 225, Issue 1, Pages 546-557

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.16116

Keywords

covariance matrices; functional strategies; functional traits; optimisation; phenotypic integration; phenotypic selection; Turnera velutina

Categories

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (Mexico) [255133]
  2. Universidad Nacitonal Autonoma de Mexico [PAPIIT IN-211314]
  3. CONACYT [132404]
  4. FONDECYT-Chile [1160138]
  5. CONICYT [AFB 17008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plant functional strategies are usually accomplished through the simultaneous expression of different traits, and hence their correlations should be promoted by natural selection. The adaptive value of correlations among leaf functional traits, however, has not been assessed in natural populations. We estimated intraspecific variation in leaf functional traits related to the primary metabolism and anti-herbivore defence in a population of Turnera velutina. We analysed whether natural selection favoured the expression of individual traits, particular combinations of traits or leaf phenotypic integration. Patterns of covariation among traits were related to water and nitrogen economy, and were similar among genotypes, but the magnitude of their phenotypic integration differed by 10-fold. Although families did not differ in the mean values of leaf functional traits, directional selection favoured low nitrogen content and low chemical defence, high content of chlorophyll, sugar in extrafloral nectar and trichome density. Families with higher phenotypic integration among leaf traits grew faster and produced more flowers. We suggest that the coordinated expression of leaf traits has an adaptive value, probably related to optimisation in the expression of traits related to water conservation and nitrogen acquisition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available