4.8 Article

Ticagrelor with or without Aspirin in High-Risk Patients after PCI

Journal

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Volume 381, Issue 21, Pages 2032-2042

Publisher

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908419

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. AstraZeneca
  2. Medtronic
  3. Abbott Vascular
  4. Boston Scientific
  5. Amgen
  6. Aralez
  7. Bayer
  8. Biosensors
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim
  10. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  11. Chiesi
  12. Daiichi Sankyo
  13. Eli Lilly
  14. Janssen
  15. Merck
  16. Sanofi
  17. CeloNova
  18. CSL Behring
  19. Eisai
  20. Gilead
  21. Idorsia Pharmaceuticals
  22. Matsutani Chemical Industry
  23. Novartis
  24. Osprey Medical
  25. RenalGuard Solutions
  26. Medicure
  27. US WorldMeds
  28. Instrumentation Laboratory
  29. Haemonetics
  30. Idorsia
  31. Ionis
  32. Abiomed
  33. Portola
  34. Bayer/Janssen
  35. Amarin
  36. Servier
  37. Corindus
  38. Abbott
  39. CSI
  40. RenalGuard
  41. Angel Medical
  42. Janssen Pharmaceuticals
  43. Johnson Johnson
  44. Portola Pharmaceuticals
  45. DSI
  46. Novartis Pharmaceuticals
  47. OrbusNeich
  48. PLC/RenalGuard
  49. BMS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Monotherapy with a P2Y(12) inhibitor after a minimum period of dual antiplatelet therapy is an emerging approach to reduce the risk of bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS In a double-blind trial, we examined the effect of ticagrelor alone as compared with ticagrelor plus aspirin with regard to clinically relevant bleeding among patients who were at high risk for bleeding or an ischemic event and had undergone PCI. After 3 months of treatment with ticagrelor plus aspirin, patients who had not had a major bleeding event or ischemic event continued to take ticagrelor and were randomly assigned to receive aspirin or placebo for 1 year. The primary end point was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding. We also evaluated the composite end point of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke, using a noninferiority hypothesis with an absolute margin of 1.6 percentage points. RESULTS We enrolled 9006 patients, and 7119 underwent randomization after 3 months. Between randomization and 1 year, the incidence of the primary end point was 4.0% among patients randomly assigned to receive ticagrelor plus placebo and 7.1% among patients assigned to receive ticagrelor plus aspirin (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45 to 0.68; P<0.001). The difference in risk between the groups was similar for BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding (incidence, 1.0% among patients receiving ticagrelor plus placebo and 2.0% among patients receiving ticagrelor plus aspirin; hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.74). The incidence of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke was 3.9% in both groups (difference, -0.06 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.97 to 0.84; hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.25; P<0.001 for noninferiority). CONCLUSIONS Among high-risk patients who underwent PCI and completed 3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy, ticagrelor monotherapy was associated with a lower incidence of clinically relevant bleeding than ticagrelor plus aspirin, with no higher risk of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available