4.6 Review

The pre-analytical phase of the liquid biopsy

Journal

NEW BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue -, Pages 19-29

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2019.09.006

Keywords

Pre-analytical phase; Liquid biopsy; Circulating tumor cells; Circulating nucleic acids; Exosomes

Funding

  1. SPIDIA4P: SPIDIA for Personalized Medicine: Standardisation of generic pre-analytical tools and procedures for in vitro diagnostics - European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [733112]
  2. Regione Toscana, bando FAS salute 2014: OMITERC-Applicazione degli OMIcs dalla biopsia solida alla biopsia liquida per una TERapia personalizzata del Cancro [BIO16028]
  3. Italian Ministry of Health [RF2011-02352294]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The term `liquid biopsy', introduced in 2013 in reference to the analysis of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) in cancer patients, was extended to cell-free nucleic acids (cfNAs) circulating in blood and other body fluids. CTCs and cfNAs are now considered diagnostic and prognostic markers, used as surrogate materials for the molecular characterisation of solid tumours, in particular for research on tumour-specific or actionable somatic mutations. Molecular characterisation of cfNAs and CTCs (especially at the single cell level) is technically challenging, requiring highly sensitive and specific methods and/or multi-step processes. The analysis of the liquid biopsy relies on a plethora of methods whose standardisation cannot be accomplished without disclosing criticisms related to the pre-analytical phase. Thus, pre-analytical factors potentially influencing downstream cellular and molecular analyses must be considered in order to translate the liquid biopsy approach into clinical practice. The present review summarises the most recent reports in this field, discussing the main pre-analytical aspects related to CTCs, cfNAs and exosomes in blood samples for liquid biopsy analysis. A short discussion on non-blood liquid biopsy samples is also included.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available