4.4 Article

DNA repair gene OGG1 polymorphism and its relation with oxidative DNA damage in patients with Alzheimer's disease

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 709, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134362

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; Oxidative DNA damage; DNA repair; OGG1 polymorphism; 8-Hydroxydeoxyguanosine

Categories

Funding

  1. Istanbul University Scientific Research Projects Unit [TSA-2017-25458]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is considerable evidence that oxidative DNA damage is increased, DNA repair capacity is decreased in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Base excision repair is the major pathway in removal of oxidative DNA damage. 8-oxo-deoxyguanosine DNA glycosylase 1 (OGG1) is the enzyme which is involved in the first step of this repair process. Alterations in DNA repair capacity may be related with polymorphisms in DNA repair genes. In order to investigate the effect of OGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism on oxidative DNA damage level, OGG1 genotyping was performed, basal and oxidative DNA damage in lymphocytes and 8-OHdG level in plasma were examined in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Basal and oxidative DNA damage and 8-OHdG level were measured by OGG1-modified comet assay and enzyme-linked immunoassay, respectively. OGG1 genotyping was performed by polymerase chain reaction- restriction fragment length polymorphism assay. Basal and oxidative DNA damage and plasma 8-OHdG levels were found to be higher in the Alzheimer's disease group than those in the control group (P < 0.001). In the Alzheimer's disease group, the levels of oxidative DNA damage was higher in the patients having OGG1 (Ser326Cys + Cys326Cys) genotype than those in the patients having OGG1 Ser326Ser genotype. It was concluded that oxidative DNA damage is increased in patients with Alzheimer's disease and OGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism may be responsible for this increase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available