4.7 Review

From pattern classification to stratification: towards conceptualizing the heterogeneity of Autism Spectrum Disorder

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 104, Issue -, Pages 240-254

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.07.010

Keywords

Autism spectrum disorder; Machine learning; Pattern recognition; Classification; Clustering; Stratification; Biotypes; Precision medicine

Funding

  1. EU-AIMS (European Autism Interventions) program from Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking Grant [115300, 777394]
  2. European Union's Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013), from the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations
  3. AIMS-2-TRIALS program from the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertalcing [777394]
  4. European Union
  5. EFPIA
  6. AUTISM SPEAKS
  7. Autistica
  8. SFARI
  9. Niels Stensen Fellowship
  10. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research VIDI Grant [016.156.415, 864.12.003]
  11. MRC [MR/N026063/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pattern classification and stratification approaches have increasingly been used in research on Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) over the last ten years with the goal of translation towards clinical applicability. Here, we present an extensive scoping literature review on those two approaches. We screened a total of 635 studies, of which 57 pattern classification and 19 stratification studies were included. We observed large variance across pattern classification studies in terms of predictive performance from about 60% to 98% accuracy, which is among other factors likely linked to sampling bias, different validation procedures across studies, the heterogeneity of ASD and differences in data quality. Stratification studies were less prevalent with only two studies reporting replications and just a few showing external validation. While some identified strata based on cognition and intelligence reappear across studies, biology as a stratification marker is clearly underexplored. In summary, mapping biological differences at the level of the individual with ASD is a major challenge for the field now. Conceptualizing those mappings and individual trajectories that lead to the diagnosis of ASD, will become a major challenge in the near future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available