4.8 Article

Suppression of autophagy impedes glioblastoma development and induces senescence

Journal

AUTOPHAGY
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages 1431-1439

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15548627.2016.1190053

Keywords

ATG7; autophagy; brain; cancer; glioblastoma; metabolism; RCAS; senescence; tumor

Categories

Funding

  1. Goodwin Experimental Therapeutic Centerss fund
  2. Cycle for Survival fund
  3. NIH [R01CA166413, R01GM113013, 1F32CA162691]
  4. Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland Grant
  5. Cancer Research UK [16243] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [F32CA162691, R01CA166413, P30CA008748] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM113013] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The function of macroautophagy/autophagy during tumor initiation or in established tumors can be highly distinct and context-dependent. To investigate the role of autophagy in gliomagenesis, we utilized a KRAS-driven glioblastoma mouse model in which autophagy is specifically disrupted via RNAi against Atg7, Atg13 or Ulk1. Inhibition of autophagy strongly reduced glioblastoma development, demonstrating its critical role in promoting tumor formation. Further supporting this finding is the observation that tumors originating from Atg7-shRNA injections escaped the knockdown effect and thereby still underwent functional autophagy. In vitro, autophagy inhibition suppressed the capacity of KRAS-expressing glial cells to form oncogenic colonies or to survive low serum conditions. Molecular analyses revealed that autophagy-inhibited glial cells were unable to maintain active growth signaling under growth-restrictive conditions and were prone to undergo senescence. Overall, these results demonstrate that autophagy is crucial for glioma initiation and growth, and is a promising therapeutic target for glioblastoma treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available