4.7 Article

Cosmological constraints from Planck galaxy clusters with CMB lensing mass bias calibration

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 489, Issue 1, Pages 401-419

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz2153

Keywords

galaxies: clusters: general; Cosmology; cosmic background radiation; cosmological parameters

Funding

  1. Isaac Newton Studentship from the University of Cambridge
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council
  4. STFC [ST/S000623/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a new cosmological analysis of the galaxy clusters in the Planck MMF3 cosmology sample with a cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing calibration of the cluster masses. As demonstrated by Planck, galaxy clusters detected via the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect offer a powerful way to constrain cosmological parameters such as Omega(m) and sigma(8). Determining the absolute cluster mass scale is, however, difficult, and some recent calibrations have yielded cosmological constraints in apparent tension with constraints in the Lambda CDM model derived from the power spectra of the primary CMB anisotropies. In order to calibrate the absolute mass scale of the full Planck cluster sample, we remeasure the masses of all 433 clusters through their weak lensing signature in the CMB temperature anisotropies as measured by Planck. We perform a joint Bayesian analysis of the cluster counts and masses taking as input the estimated cluster masses, SZ signal-to-noise ratios, and redshifts. Our analysis properly accounts for selection effects in the construction of the cluster sample. We find sigma(8)(Omega(m)/0.33)(0.25) = 0.765 +/- 0.035 and 1 - b(SZ) = 0.71 +/- 0.10, where the mass bias factor 1 - b(SZ) relates cluster mass to the SZ mass that appears in the X-ray-calibrated cluster scaling relations. We find no evidence for tension with the Planck primary CMB constraints on Lambda CDM model parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available