4.7 Article

Is the dark-matter halo spin a predictor of galaxy spin and size?

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 488, Issue 4, Pages 4801-4815

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz1952

Keywords

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: haloes; dark matter

Funding

  1. I-CORE Program of thePBC/ISF [1829/12]
  2. BSF [2014-273]
  3. PICS [2015-18]
  4. NSF [AST-1405962]
  5. Council for Higher Education in Israel
  6. ERC [339177]
  7. [ISF124/12]
  8. [HST-AR-14578.001-A]
  9. European Research Council (ERC) [339177] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The similarity between the distributions of spins for galaxies (lambda(gal)) and for dark-matter haloes (lambda(halo)), indicated both by simulations and observations, is naively interpreted as a one-to-one correlation between the spins of a galaxy and its host halo. This is used to predict galaxy sizes in semi-analytic models via R-e similar or equal to f(j)lambda R-halo(vir), where R-e is the half-mass radius of the galaxy, f(j) is the angular momentum retention factor, and R-vir is the halo radius. Using two suites of zoom-in cosmological simulations, we find that lambda(gal) and the lambda(halo) of its host halo are in fact barely correlated, especially at z >= 1, in line with previous indications. Since the spins of baryons and dark matter are correlated at accretion into R-vir, the null correlation in the end reflects an anticorrelation between f(j) and lambda(halo), which can arise from mergers and a wet compaction' phase that many high-redshift galaxies undergo. It may also reflect that unrepresentative small fractions of baryons are tapped to the galaxies. The galaxy spin is better correlated with the spin of the inner halo, but this largely reflects the effect of the baryons on the halo. While lambda(halo) is not a useful predictor for R-e, our simulations reproduce a general relation of the form of R-e= AR(vir), in agreement with observational estimates. We find that the relation becomes tighter with A= 0.02(c/10)(-0.7), where c is the halo concentration, which in turn introduces a dependence on mass and redshift.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available