4.7 Article

Revealing the Invisible Gorilla in construction: Estimating construction safety through mental workload assessment

Journal

AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION
Volume 63, Issue -, Pages 173-183

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2015.12.018

Keywords

Construction safety; Mental workload; Electroencephalography (EEG); Inattentional blindness; Vulnerability

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51508487]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Construction companies can accrue losses due to labor fatalities and injuries. Since more than 70% of all accidents are related to human activities, detecting and mitigating human-related risks hold the key to improving the safety conditions within the construction industry. Previous research has revealed that the psychological and emotional conditions of workers can contribute to fatalities and injuries. Recent observations in the area of neural science and psychology suggest that inattentional blindness is one major cause of unexpected human related accidents. Due to the limitation of human mental workload, laborers are vulnerable to unexpected hazards while focusing on complicated construction tasks. Therefore, the ability to detect the mental conditions of workers could reduce unexpected injuries. However, there are currently no available measurement approaches or devices capable of monitoring construction workers' mental conditions. The research proposed in this paper aims to develop a measurement approach to evaluate hazards through neural time-frequency analysis. The experimental results show that neural signals are valid for mental load assessment of construction workers, especially the low frequency bands signals. The research also describes the development of a prototype for a wearable electro-encephalography (EEG) safety helmet that enables the collection of the neural information required as input for the measurement approach. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available