4.6 Article

Systematic mapping of protein-metabolite interactions in central metabolism of Escherichia coli

Journal

MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/msb.20199008

Keywords

allostery; central metabolism; nuclear magnetic resonance; protein-metabolite interactions; regulation

Funding

  1. SignalX project of the Swiss Initiative for Systems Biology (SystemsX.ch)
  2. Promedica Stiftung, Chur [1300/M]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metabolite binding to proteins regulates nearly all cellular processes, but our knowledge of these interactions originates primarily from empirical in vitro studies. Here, we report the first systematic study of interactions between water-soluble proteins and polar metabolites in an entire biological subnetwork. To test the depth of our current knowledge, we chose to investigate the well-characterized Escherichia coli central metabolism. Using ligand-detected NMR, we assayed 29 enzymes towards binding events with 55 intracellular metabolites. Focusing on high-confidence interactions at a false-positive rate of 5%, we detected 98 interactions, among which purine nucleotides accounted for one-third, while 50% of all metabolites did not interact with any enzyme. In contrast, only five enzymes did not exhibit any metabolite binding and some interacted with up to 11 metabolites. About 40% of the interacting metabolites were predicted to be allosteric effectors based on low chemical similarity to their target's reactants. For five of the eight tested interactions, in vitro assays confirmed novel regulatory functions, including ATP and GTP inhibition of the first pentose phosphate pathway enzyme. With 76 new candidate regulatory interactions that have not been reported previously, we essentially doubled the number of known interactions, indicating that the presently available information about protein-metabolite interactions may only be the tip of the iceberg.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available