4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Buffer breakdown in GaN-on-Si HEMTs: A comprehensive study based on a sequential growth experiment

Journal

MICROELECTRONICS RELIABILITY
Volume 100, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2019.113461

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. project InRel-NPower (Innovative Reliable Nitride based Power Devices and Applications)
  2. European Union [720527]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this work is to investigate the breakdown mechanisms of the layers constituting the vertical buffer of GaN-on-Si HEMTs; in addition, for the first time we demonstrate that the breakdown field of the MN nucleation layer grown on a silicon substrate is equal to 3.2 MV/cm and evaluate its temperature dependence. To this aim, three samples, obtained by stopping the epitaxial growth of a GaN on Silicon stack at different steps, are studied and compared: Si/AlN, Si/AlN/AlGaN, full vertical stack up to the Carbon doped buffer layer. The current-voltage (IV) characterizations performed at both room temperature and high temperature show that: (i) the defectiveness of the MN nucleation layer is the root cause of the leakage through an AlN/Silicon junction, and causes the vertical I-V characteristics to have a high device-to-device variability; (ii) the first AlGaN layer grown over the MN, beside improving the breakdown voltage of the whole structure, causes the leakage current to be more stable and uniform across the sample area; (iii) a thick strain-relief stack and a carbon-doped GaN buffer enhance the breakdown voltage up to more than 750 V at 170 degrees C, and guarantee a remarkably low device-to-device variability. Furthermore, a set of constant voltage stress on the Si/A1N sample demonstrate that the aluminum nitride layer shows a time dependent breakdown, with Weibull-distributed failures and a shape factor greater than 1, in line with the percolation model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available