4.7 Article

Input-to-state stability of impulsive stochastic delayed systems under linear assumptions

Journal

AUTOMATICA
Volume 66, Issue -, Pages 195-204

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2016.01.002

Keywords

Input-to-state stability; Impulsive stochastic systems; Average impulsive interval; Time-delays

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [61590923, 11326121, 61503328, 71571001]
  2. Anhui Excellent Youth Fund [2013SQRL033ZD]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province [1408085QA09]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [222201514328]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M571629]
  6. Top Talent Support Program of Yangzhou University
  7. Thousand Youth Talents Plan of China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, the input-to-state stability (ISS), integral-ISS (iISS) and stochastic-ISS (SISS) are investigated for impulsive stochastic delayed systems. By means of the Lyapunov-Krasovskii function and the average impulsive interval approach, the conditions for ISS-type properties are derived under linear assumptions, respectively, for destabilizing and stabilizing impulses. It is shown that if the continuous stochastic delayed system is ISS and the impulsive effects are destabilizing, then the hybrid system is ISS with respect to a lower bound of the average impulsive interval. Moreover, it is unveiled that if the continuous stochastic delayed system is not ISS, the impulsive effects can successfully stabilize the system for a given upper bound of the average impulsive interval. An improved comparison principle is developed for impulsive stochastic delayed systems, which facilitates the derivations of our results for ISS/iISS/SISS. An example of networked control systems is provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed results. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available