4.6 Article

Oxidation Behaviors of Si/Al Pack Cementation Coated Mo-3Si-1B Alloys at Various Temperatures

Journal

METALS AND MATERIALS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages 914-921

Publisher

KOREAN INST METALS MATERIALS
DOI: 10.1007/s12540-019-00471-4

Keywords

Mo– Si– B alloy; Diffusion coatings; Pack cementation; Oxidation behaviors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to enhance the oxidation resistance of Mo-3Si-1B alloy at high temperatures by applying Si/Al pack cementation coatings. The diffusion pack coatings resulted in the formation of Mo(Si, Al)(2) and Mo3Al8 layers along with an Al2O3 protective oxide layer after oxidation tests. The improved oxidation behaviors were attributed to the formation of an Al2O3 oxide layer through Si/Al pack cementation coatings.
In this study, we tried to improve the oxidation resistance of Mo-3Si-1B (wt%) alloy at intermediate (800 degrees C) and high temperature (1300 degrees C) after applying Si/Al pack cementation coatings. In addition, we examined structural changes and phase change in the intermediate and high temperature oxidizing atmospheres to observe oxidation behaviors. The diffusion pack coatings were carried out with an NH4F activator and both Si and Al powder mixtures. Mo-Si-B alloys were subjected to diffusion coatings of Si/Al powders at various temperatures in various time conditions at a temperature of 1100 degrees C. When the pack coatings were carried out for 48 h, Mo(Si, Al)(2) and Mo3Al8 layers together with a T2 (Mo5SiB2) layer were successfully synthesized on the substrate. After oxidation tests, an Al2O3 protective oxide layer was formed by the diffusion of Al in an ambient atmosphere. The Si/Al pack cementation coatings provided excellent oxidation resistance through the formation of an Al2O3 oxide layer. The enhanced oxidation behaviors are discussed in terms of microstructural evolution at high temperatures. Graphic

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available