4.7 Article

Design and engineering of E. coli metabolic sensor strains with a wide sensitivity range for glycerate

Journal

METABOLIC ENGINEERING
Volume 57, Issue -, Pages 96-109

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2019.09.002

Keywords

Auxotrophy; Constraint-based metabolic model; Growth selection; Synthetic biology

Funding

  1. Max Planck Society
  2. European Union [686330]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microbial biosensors are used to detect the presence of compounds provided externally or produced internally. The latter case is commonly constrained by the need to screen a large library of enzyme or pathway variants to identify those that can efficiently generate the desired compound. To address this limitation, we suggest the use of metabolic sensor strains which can grow only if the relevant compound is present and thus replace screening with direct selection. We used a computational platform to design metabolic sensor strains with varying dependencies on a specific compound. Our method systematically explores combinations of gene deletions and identifies how the growth requirement for a compound changes with the media composition. We demonstrate this approach by constructing a set of E. coli glycerate sensor strains. In each of these strains a different set of enzymes is disrupted such that central metabolism is effectively dissected into multiple segments, each requiring a dedicated carbon source. We find an almost perfect match between the predicted and experimental dependence on glycerate and show that the strains can be used to accurately detect glycerate concentrations across two orders of magnitude. Apart from demonstrating the potential application of metabolic sensor strains, our work reveals key phenomena in central metabolism, including spontaneous degradation of central metabolites and the importance of metabolic sinks for balancing small metabolic networks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available