4.2 Article

Anxiolytic and anticonvulsant activity followed by molecular docking study of ceramides from the Red Sea sponge Negombata sp

Journal

MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 28, Issue 11, Pages 1818-1827

Publisher

SPRINGER BIRKHAUSER
DOI: 10.1007/s00044-019-02408-3

Keywords

Negombata sp; Ceramide; Anticonvulsant; Anxiolytic; Molecular modeling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The chemical investigation of the Red Sea sponge Negombata sp. led to isolation and structure elucidation of five new ceramides N ((2S,3R,4E,8E)-1,3-dihydroxyhexacosa-4,8-dien-2-yl)pentadecanamide (1), N-((2S,3R,E)-1,3-dihydroxynonadec-4-en-2-yl)stearamide (2), N-[(2S,3R,E)-1,3 dihydroxyhexacos-4-en-2-yl]palmitamide (3), N-((2S,3R)-1,3-dihydroxydodecan-2-yl)tetradecanamide (4), N-[(2S,3S,4R)-1,3,4- trihydroxypentadecan-2-yl] palmitamide (5). Structure elucidation was achieved using spectroscopic techniques, including 1D and 2D NMR and HRMS. The isolated ceramides were tested for anti-anxiety action in the elevated plus maze and the light-dark transition box. Mice given diazepam or compounds number 1, 2, 3, and 5 spent longer time in the light area of the light-dark box. However, compound 4 did not produce a similar effect. Similarly, testing anti-anxiety action in the elevated plus maze test showed that the compounds number 2, 3, and 5 or diazepam were able to prolong the open arm time %. Meanwhile, compounds 1 and 4 failed to produce a similar response. In addition, the anticonvulsant action of the ceramides was assessed employing pentylenetetrazole-induced seizures, where some ceramides prolonged the time to death due to pentylenetetrazole in vivo. In silico testing of the isolated ceramides displayed reasonable GABA receptor modulator binding at the benzodiazepines site. Ceramide 1 showed slightly stronger interaction with the GABA receptor over other ceramides which is compatible with the results of their anxiolytic activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available