4.7 Article

The extraction of Campbell diagrams from the dynamical system representation of a foil-air bearing rotor model

Journal

MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 129, Issue -, Pages 502-530

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.04.018

Keywords

Foil-air bearings; Dynamical systems; Nonlinear analysis; Linearisation; Campbell diagrams

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council of the UK [EP/I029184/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/I029184/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Campbell diagrams describe the variation with speed of the modes of low amplitude (linear) free vibration of a rotordynamic system about its static equilibrium condition, and are an important tool that aids the interpretation of the nonlinear response. However, Campbell diagrams for foil-air bearing (FAB) rotor systems are currently derived using the linear force coefficients (FC) method and individual modes have not been verified by transient nonlinear dynamic analysis (TNDA) at low amplitudes. In fact, significant discrepancies between FC and TNDA predictions for the stability of the leading (i.e. least damped) mode have been reported. This paper establishes for the first time a method for deriving Campbell diagrams of a generic FAB-rotor model that avoids the FC method. It is based on an eigenvalue analysis of the Jacobian matrix of the dynamical system. Through suitable scaling and the application of appropriate criteria, the multitude of eigenvectors of the Jacobian can be filtered to extract the relevant modes. Each mode is verified using TNDA with mode-specific initial conditions derived from the Campbell diagram analysis. The methodology is successfully tested on three cases in the literature, which respectively illustrate its applicability to complex bearing types (3-pad), complex foil models, and flexible rotors. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available