4.7 Article

Theoretical investigation of the contributions of the excitation forces to the vibration of an axial piston pump

Journal

MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 129, Issue -, Pages 201-217

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.04.032

Keywords

Axial piston pump; Dynamic model; Computational fluid dynamics; Excitation forces; Vibration characteristics

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2014CB046403]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51705451]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M611982]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A theoretical dynamic model of an axial piston pump was developed in this paper. The axial piston pump was modeled as a dynamic system with four masses and 19 degrees of freedom (DOFs). The dynamic excitation forces were calculated using the piston chamber pressures simulated with a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model. A test rig was constructed to validate both the CFD model and the dynamic model. The CFD model was validated by a comparison of the discharge pressure ripples, and the dynamic model was validated by a comparison of the vibration velocities. The vibration characteristics and the contributions of the excitation forces to the vibrations of the housing were analyzed. The results demonstrated that the vibration velocity along the X-F- axis is larger than the vibration velocities along the Y-F- and Z(F)- axes, and the vibration angular velocity around the X-F- axis is smaller than that around the Y-F- axis. The excitation moments of forces M-CY and M-PY have large contributions to most of the vibrations, and the excitation moments of forces M-CX and M-PX have negligible contributions to most of the vibrations. In addition, the vibrations are found to be significantly reduced by optimizing the bolt mounting positions. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available