4.6 Article

Mixed-integer bilevel representability

Journal

MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING
Volume 185, Issue 1-2, Pages 163-197

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10107-019-01424-w

Keywords

Bilevel programming; Representability; Stackelberg games

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article investigates the representability of sets by extended formulations using mixed-integer bilevel programs, demonstrating that feasible regions modeled by certain constraints are finite unions of polyhedra. It proves that the feasible region of bilevel problems with integer variables exclusively in the upper level is a finite union of sets representable by mixed-integer programs, and shows that allowing integer variables in the lower level does not add additional modeling power. The family of sets that are finite unions of mixed-integer representable sets forms an algebra of sets, closed under finite unions, intersections and complementation.
We study the representability of sets by extended formulations using mixed-integer bilevel programs. We show that feasible regions modeled by continuous bilevel constraints (with no integer variables), complementarity constraints, and polyhedral reverse convex constraints are all finite unions of polyhedra. Conversely, any finite union of polyhedra can be represented using any one of these three paradigms. We then prove that the feasible region of bilevel problems with integer variables exclusively in the upper level is a finite union of sets representable by mixed-integer programs and vice versa. Further, we prove that, up to topological closures, we do not get additional modeling power by allowing integer variables in the lower level as well. To establish the last statement, we prove that the family of sets that are finite unions of mixed-integer representable sets (up to topological closures) forms an algebra of sets; i.e., this family is closed under finite unions, intersections and complementation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available