4.5 Article

Electromagnetic interference shielding behavior of hybrid carbon nanotube/exfoliated graphite nanoplatelet coated glass fiber composites

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mseb.2019.114403

Keywords

Hybrid nanocomposite; Carbon nanotube; Exfoliated graphite nanoplatelet; Glass fiber; Electromagnetic interference shielding

Funding

  1. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) - Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea [20174030201430, 20174030201530]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20174030201530, 20174030201430] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the tailored electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness (EMI SE) of polyester-matrix composites consisting of glass fiber textiles coated with multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and exfoliated graphite nanoplatelets (xGnPs). The effects of various combinations of material parameters, including MWCNT length, xGnP size, MWCNT:xGnP weight ratio, host-substrate surface configuration of carbon nanomaterials (CNMs), and their amount coated per unit area, on the EMI SE were studied. The shielding mechanisms, namely, absorption, reflection, and multiple reflections, are discussed based on the underlying governing physics. EMI SE measurements showed that coating glass fibers with hybrid MWCNTs/xGnPs at 8/2 ratio yields EMI SEs higher than those of composites containing the same content of a single-type of CNM, ranging from 56.8 dB at 30 MHz to 35.3 dB at 1.5 GHz. Morphological studies showed that, upon placement on glass fiber surfaces, 1D fiber-like MWCNTs serve as interconnects that bridge the randomly oriented 2D platelet-like xGnPs to form an efficient plane shield of electromagnetic waves.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available