4.5 Article

MR fingerprinting for water T1 and fat fraction quantification in fat infiltrated skeletal muscles

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages 621-634

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27960

Keywords

fat fraction; MRF; MRI; skeletal muscle; water T1

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To develop a fast MR fingerprinting (MRF) sequence for simultaneous estimation of water T1 (T1(H2O)) and fat fraction (FF) in fat infiltrated skeletal muscles. Methods The MRF sequence for T1(H2O) and FF quantification (MRF T1-FF) comprises a 1400 radial spokes echo train, following nonselective inversion, with varying echo and repetition time, as well as prescribed flip angle. Undersampled frames were reconstructed at different acquisition time-points by nonuniform Fourier transform, and a bi-component model based on Bloch simulations applied to adjust the signal evolution and extract T1(H2O) and FF. The sequence was validated on a multi-vial phantom, in three healthy volunteers and five patients with neuromuscular diseases. We evaluated the agreement between MRF T1-FF parameters and reference values and confounding effects due to B0 and B1 inhomogeneities. Results In phantom, T1(H2O) and FF were highly correlated with references values measured with multi-inversion time inversion recovery-stimulated echo acquisition mode and Dixon, respectively (R-2 > 0.99). In vivo, T1(H2O) and FF determined by the MRF T1-FF sequence were also correlated with reference values (R-2 = 0.98 and 0.97, respectively). The precision on T1(H2O) was better than 5% for muscles where FF was less than 0.4. Both T1(H2O) and FF values were not confounded by B0 nor B1 inhomogeneities. Conclusion The MRF T1-FF sequence derived T1(H2O) and FF values in voxels containing a mixture of water and fat protons. This method can be used to comprehend and characterize the effects of tissue water compartmentation and distribution on muscle T1 values in patients affected by chronic fat infiltration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available