4.5 Article

Risk of ocular complications following radiation therapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Journal

LARYNGOSCOPE
Volume 130, Issue 5, Pages 1270-1277

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lary.28254

Keywords

Ocular complications; radiation therapy; nasopharyngeal carcinoma; National Health Insurance Research Database

Funding

  1. Tri-Service General Hospital grants [TSGH-C108-058, TSGH-C108-057]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To examine the risk of ocular complications following radiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods We adopted 1:1 propensity score matching and identified an NPC cohort (n = 736) and a comparison cohort (n = 736) that comprised non-NPC head and neck cancer patients who received radiotherapy in the National Health Insurance Research Database from 1997 to 2010. The follow-up period was terminated upon developing ocular complications (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM]360-379) or on December 31, 2010. Results After adjusting for the confounding factors of the study, the NPC cohort had a higher adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for developing ocular complications than the comparison cohort (adjusted HR = 2.786, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.805-4.112, P < 0.001). The NPC cohort was associated with a significantly higher risk of developing ocular complications compared with the comparison cohort within 12 and after 24 months of follow-up (P < 0.05). The most common associated ocular complications were optic nerve disorder and retinopathy. Conclusions Patients with NPC might be at higher risk of developing ocular complications after radiotherapy than non-NPC head and neck cancer patients in Taiwan. Either further investigation or routine assessments by ophthalmological physician is recommended. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope, 2019

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available