4.7 Article

Evolutionary multi-objective automatic clustering enhanced with quality metrics and ensemble strategy

Journal

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
Volume 188, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2019.105018

Keywords

Clustering; Evolutionary multi-objective optimization; Cluster validity index; Ensemble method

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [61573258]
  2. U.S. National Science Foundation's BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action [DBI-0939454]
  3. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Automatic clustering problem, which needs to detect the appropriate clustering without a pre-defined number of clusters (k), is difficult and challenging in unsupervised learning owing to the lack of prior domain knowledge. Despite a rising tendency with the application of evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) techniques for automatic clustering, there still exist some obvious under-explored issues. In this paper, we resort to quality metrics and ensemble strategy for the sake of explicit/implicit knowledge discovery to guide the optimization process. The quality and diversity of solutions defined in terms of cluster validities, as similar to performance indicator for multi-objective optimization, are applied to assist in addressing automatic clustering problems and decreasing unnecessary computational overhead. To be specific, the main components like initialization, reproduction operations, and environmental selection which involved during EMO based automatic clustering are discussed and refined. For the determination of the final partitioning, quality metrics and cluster ensemble strategy are both considered to improve the retrieve system in the unsupervised way. Experiments are conducted from several different aspects and the corresponding analyses are provided, which confirm that the proposals are more efficient and effective for automatic clustering. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available