4.5 Article

Mentally Challenging Occupations Are Associated With More Rapid Cognitive Decline at Later Stages of Cognitive Aging

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbz122

Keywords

Cognitive aging; Cognitive reserve; Occupational complexity; Retirement

Funding

  1. National Institute on Aging (NIA) [P01AG003949, T32 AG049676]
  2. Sylvia and Leonard Marx Foundation
  3. Czap Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Engaging in mentally challenging occupations may lead to faster rates of cognitive decline, but the protective effect on cognition persists for decades after retirement.
Objectives: Engaging in mentally challenging activities is associated with reduced risk for cognitive impairment and dementia; however, its association with rates of cognitive decline has been inconsistent. The aim of this study is to test whether working in mentally challenging occupations is related to rates of cognitive change at later older adulthood. Method: The sample consisted of 1,520 individuals (baseline mean age = 78.6 +/- 5.1, range = 64-100) from the Einstein Aging Study. Occupation information of each participant was collected retrospectively and linked with the substantive complexity of work score from the Dictionary of Occupational Titles. Cognitive changes in memory, speed, and executive function (EF) domains were represented using two time metrics (i.e., time from retirement, time from study enrollment). Results: Results from mixed models showed that occupational complexity was associated with significantly faster rates of cognitive decline in speed and EF in the time from retirement model but not in the time from baseline model. Despite faster cognitive loss, the protective effect of occupational complexity persisted for decades after retirement due to higher initial levels of cognition. Discussion: The result suggests that protective factors for cognitive health may be associated with delayed onset but more rapid cognitive decline afterwards at later stages of cognitive aging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available